A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Sangha, K. S.
- Standardization of Release Rate of Trichogramma chilonis (Ishii) in Bio-Intensive Management of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in Fodder Maize
Authors
1 Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana – 141004, Punjab, IN
2 Department of Entomology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana – 141004, Punjab, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 31, No 4 (2017), Pagination: 254-258Abstract
The early season attack of Chilo partellus, in kharif sown fodder maize inflicts appreciable losses, if unchecked. Biointensive management with the use of egg parasitoid Trichogramma chilonis Ishii in fodder maize through different doses and release rate was standardized. The results of the trials from two years showed that damage parameters like Leaf Injury (LI), recorded three weeks after parasitoid release from 0.25-6.00 per cent across different treatments whereas in untreated control it was 6.50-13.25 %, respectively. Similarly the observations on percent DH patterns in different treatments varied from 0.62-3.75 % as compared to control (5.50-9.0 %). Furthermore, the per cent reduction in damage was substantially low with the second inundative release of the parasitoid than plots receiving a single release of bio-agent at a given dose. The proportion of DH recorded at three weeks after release was significantly lower (1.0 and 0.62%) in plots with t-cards @ 125,000 parasitized eggs in two releases as compared with other treatments. Additionally the green fodder yield obtained in promising treatment was statistically superior (445 q ha-1) to 392 q ha-1 GFY as recorded in the untreated control and other lower dose treatments except the plots receiving the highest dose of parasitoid release (450q ha-1). Thus the results suggested that field release of T. chilonis @ 125,000 parasitoids per hectare in two releases helps in substantial reduction of C. partellus inflicted damage with high economic returns.Keywords
Chilo partellus, Deadhearts, Fodder Maize, Leaf Injury, Trichogramma chilonis.References
- Farid A, Khan MIN, Khan A, Khattak SUK, Amamzeb, Sattar A. 2007. Studies on maize stem borer, Chilo partellus in Peshawar Valley. Pak J. Zool. 39(2):127–131 Aggarwal N, Jindal J. 2013. Validation of biocontrol technology for suppression of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) on kharif maize in Punjab. J Biol Control 27(4): 278-284.
- Arabjafari KH, Jalali SK. 2007. Identification and analysis of host plant resistance in leading maize genotypes against spotted stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Pak. J Biol Sci. 10: 1885–1895. Crossref. PMid:19086556
- Cheema HS, Singh B. 1991. Software Statistical Package CPCS-I. Department of Statistics. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.
- Prasad GS, Babu KS, Subbarayudu B, Bhagwat VR, Patil JV. 2015. Identification of sweet sorghum accessions possessing multiple resistance to shoot fly (Atherigona soccata Rondani) and spotted stem borer (Chilo partellus swinhoe). Sugar Tech. 17(2): 173–180. Crossref.
- Gomez KA, Agomez A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd edn. Wiley–Interscience, New York. 680 pp.
- Jalali SK, Singh SP. 2006. Biological control of Chilo partellus using egg parasitoid Trichogramma chilonis and Bacillus thuringiensis. Indian J. Agri Res. 40(3): 183–189.
- Pal R, Singh G, Prased CS, Ali N, Kumar A, Dhaka SS. 2009. Field evaluation of bio-pesticide and bio-agent against maize stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize. Ann Pl Prot Sci. 17: 325–327.
- Pingali PI. 2001. CIMMYT. 1999-2000: World maize facts and trends, meeting world maize need, technological opportunities and priorities for the public sector. CIMMYT, Mexico. D.F: 57.
- Rawat US, Pawar AD, Joshi V.1994. Impact of inundative releases of Trichogramma chilonis in control of maize stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in Himachal Pradesh. Pl Prot Bull. 46: 28–30.
- Siddiqui KH, Marwaha KK. 1993. The vistas of maize entomology in India, Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, India, 185 pp.
- Somchaudhary AK, Dutt N. 1988. Influence of hosts and host ages on bionomics of Trichogramma perkinsi Girault and Trichogramma australicum Girault. Indian J Ent. 50: 374–379
- On-Farm Impact of Egg Parasitoid, Trichogramma Spp. Against Lepidopteran Pests in Organic Basmati Rice
Authors
1 Biocontrol Section, Department of Entomology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana - 141004, Punjab, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 32, No 2 (2018), Pagination: 116-120Abstract
On farm impact of Trichogrammatids was studied against lepidopteran pests, i.e., yellow stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas (Walker) and leaf folder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenee) in organic basmati rice (var. Pusa 1121) over an area of 20 and 60 hectares during 2014 and 2015, respectively. Six augmentative releases of Trichogramma chilonis and T. japonicum each @ 1,00,000 parasitoids/ha were made starting from 30 days after transplanting (DAT) and was compared with untreated control. Based on the overall mean, the biocontrol treatment (1.74% DH) was significantly effective in reducing the dead heart incidence as compared to untreated control (4.52% DH). The reduction in dead hearts was 61.50 per cent in biocontrol over untreated control. The mean incidence of white ears was also significantly lower in biocontrol field (2.05%) as against untreated control (4.89%) resulting in a reduction of 58.08 per cent. Similarly, leaf folder damage in biocontrol (2.04% LFDL) resulted in 62.50 per cent reduction over untreated control (5.44% LFDL). Grain yield in biocontrol fields (29.81 q/ha) was 18.76 per cent more than the untreated control (25.10 q/ha). The increase in yield due to control of stem borers and leaf folder in biocontrol fields resulted in an additional benefit of INR 16332/- and INR 9818/- during 2014 and 2015, respectively. Conclusively, 6 releases of T. chilonis and T. japonicum each @ 1,00,000/ha resulted in lower incidence of rice insect pests and higher grain yield in organic basmati rice with an additional benefit over untreated control.Keywords
Biocontrol, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis, Scircophaga incertulas, Trichogramma Augmentation.References
- Brar KS, Singh J, Shenhmar M, Bakhetia DRC, Singh J. 1999. Insect and Environment. pp. 206–210. In: Pajni H R, Tewari PK, Kaur D (Eds.). Evaluation of Trichogramma chilonis Ishii and T. japanicum Ashmead for the control of leaf folder and stem borer of rice in Punjab. Society of Environment Scientists, Chandigarh.
- Bueno R, Bueno AD, Parra JRP, Vieira SS, de Oliveira LJ. 2010. Biological characteristics and parasitism capacity of Trichogramma pretiosum Riley (Hymenoptera, Trichogrammatidae) on eggs of Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 54: 322–327. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262010000200016
- Dhaliwal GS, Jindal V and Dhawan AK. 2010. Insect pest Problems and crop losses: changing trends. Indian J Ecol. 37: 1–7.
- Garg DK, Kumar P, Singh RN, Pathak M. 2002. Role of parasitoid Trichogramma japonicum and other natural enemies in the management of yellow stemborer and leaffolder in basmati rice. Indian J Ent. 64: 117–123.
- Gomez KA, Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York, USA, 704 p.
- Kalode MB. 2005. Insect pests of rice and their management. In: Sharma SD and Nayak BC (Eds.). Rice in Indian Perspective. Today and Tomorrow Printers and Publishers, India. pp. 819-854.
- Karthikeyan K, Jacob S, Purushothaman SM. 2007. Field evaluation of egg parasitoids, Trichogramma japonicum Ashmead and Trichogramma chilonis Ishii, against rice yellow stemborer and leaffolder. J Biol Control 21: 145–148.
- Kaur R, Brar KS. 2008. Evaluation of different doses of Trichogramma species for the management of leaf folder and stem borer on Basmati rice. J Biol Control 22(1): 131–135.
- Ko K, Liu Y, Hou M, Babendreier, Zhang F, Song K. 2014. Evaluation for potential Trichogramma (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) strains for control of the striped stem borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in the Greater Mekong Subregion. J Econ Entomol. 107(3): 955–963. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC13481
- Kumar S, Khan MA. 2005. Bio-efficacy of Trichogramma spp. against yellow stemborer and leaffolder in rice ecosystem. Ann Pl Prot Sci. 13: 97–99.
- Nathan SS, Chung PG, Murugan K. 2004. Effect of botanicals and bacterial toxin on the gut enzyme of Cnaphalocrocis medinalis. Phytoparasitica 32: 433– 443. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02980437
- Sagheer M, Ashfaq M, Mansoor-ul-Hasan, Rana SA. 2008. Integration of some biopesticides and Trichogramma chilonis for the sustainable management of rice leaffolder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenee) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Pak J Agri Sci. 45: 69–74.
- Shawer MB, EL-Agamy FM, Hendawy AS, Refaei EA. 2013. Effect of Trichogramma evanescens West release in rice stem borer control. J Plant Prot Path Mansoura Univ. 4(3): 261–264.
- Singh J, Dhaliwal GS, Singh J, Shera PS. 2002. Changing scenario of rice insect pests in Punjab and their management strategies. Indian J Ecol. 29: 208–220.
- Singh J. 2011. Impact assessment study of IPM basmati project for boosting diversification process in Punjab. Navajbai Rata Tata Trust, Mumbai, India, 43 p.
- USDA-FAS. 2016. World Agricultural Production. Available at: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/ current/worldag-production/worldag-production12-09-2016.pdf.
- Impact of Bio-Intensive Integrated Pest Management Practices on Insect Pests and Grain Yield in Basmati Rice
Authors
1 Biocontrol Section, Department of Entomology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana - 141004, Punjab, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 32, No 2 (2018), Pagination: 137-141Abstract
Bio-intensive pest management practices were compared with farmer’s practices and untreated control in basmati rice at village Sahauli (Punjab). BIPM practices involved green manuring; seed treatment; alternate wetting and drying of the field; installation of pheromone traps and bird perches; augmentative releases of Trichogramma spp.; spray of Neem oil 1%. The farmer’s practices comprised the applications of chemical insecticides. The mean leaffolder damage was 3.12, 1.90 and 5.41 per cent in BIPM, farmer’s practice and untreated control, respectively. The dead heart incidence was 2.49 per cent in BIPM, 1.16 per cent in farmer’s practice and 4.30 per cent in untreated control. Similarly, the mean incidence of white earheads was 3.31, 1.78 and 5.06 per cent in BIPM, farmer’s practice and untreated control, respectively. Highest grain yield was recorded in farmer’s practice fields (30.63 q/ha) followed by yield in BIPM fields (28.07 q/ha). These yields were significantly better than untreated control (25.18 q/ha).The population of natural enemies was higher in BIPM fields as compared to farmer’s practiced fields.Keywords
Basmati, Bio-Intensive Pest Management, Leaf Folder, Natural Enemies, Stem Borer.References
- Aggarwal N, Sharma S, Jalali SK. 2016. On-farm impact of biocontrol technology against rice stem borer, Scircophaga incertulas (Walker) and rice leaf folder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenee) in aromatic rice. Entomol Gen. 36: 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1127/ entomologia/2016/0135
- APEDA. 2017. Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority. Available at: http: // agriexchange. apeda.gov.in/product_profile/prodintro/ Basmati_Rice.aspx
- Garg DK, Kumar P, Singh RN, Pathak M. 2002. Role of parasitoid Trichogramma japonicum and other natural enemies in the management of yellow stemborer and leaffolder in basmati rice. Indian J Entomol. 64:117–123.
- Gomez KA, Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York, USA, 704 p.
- GRiSP. 2013. Global Rice Science Partnership – Rice Almanac, 4th edition. International Rice Research Institute, Los Ba-os, Philippines, 283 p.
- IRRI. 2011. Opportunities for global rice research in a changing World, Technical Bulletin No. 15, International Rice Research Institute, Los Ba-os, Philippines, 25 p.
- Karthikeyan K, Jacob S, Beevi P, Purushothaman SM. 2010. Evaluation of different integrated pest management modules for the management of major pests of rice (Oryza sativa). Indian J Agric Sci.: 80: 59–62.
- Karthikeyan K, Jacob S, Purushothaman SM. 2007. Field evaluation of egg parasitoids, Trichogramma japonicum Ashmead and Trichogramma chilonis Ishii, against rice yellow stemborer and leaffolder. J Biol Control 21: 145–148.
- Kaur R, Brar KS, Singh J, Shenhmar M. 2007. Large scale evaluation of bio-intensive management for leaf folder and stem borer on basmati rice. J Biol Control 21: 255–259.
- Khan RA, Khan JA, Jamil FF, Hamed M. 2005. Resistance of different Basmati rice varieties to stem borers under different control tactics of BIPM and evaluation of yield. Pak J Bot. 37: 319–324.
- Kumar S, Khan MA. 2005. Bio-efficacy of Trichogramma spp against yellow stem borer and leaf folder in rice ecosystem. Ann Plant Protect Sci. 13: 97–99.
- Kumar S, Maurya RP, Khan MA. 2007. Impact of biointensive pest management strategies on yellow stem borer and leaf folder in rice and their effect on the economics of production. J Entomol Res. 31:11–13.
- Matteson PC. 2000. Insect pest management in tropical Asian irrigated rice. Ann Rev Entomol. 45: 549–574
- https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.549
- Sagheer M, Ashfaq M, Mansoor-ul-Hasan, Rana SA. 2008. Integration of some biopesticides and Trichogramma chilonis for the sustainable management of rice leaffolder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenee) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Pak J Agri Sci. 45: 69–74.
- Sharma OP, Garg DK, Trivedi TP, Satpal C, Singh SP. 2008. Evaluation of pest management strategies in organic and conventional Taraori Basmati Rice (Oryza Sativa L) farming system. Indian J Agric Sci. 78: 862–867.
- Sharma S, Aggarwal N. 2014. Time-linked dosage appraisal of Trichogrammatids against Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenée) and Scirpophaga incertulas (Walker) in organic aromatic rice. Eco Environ Conserv. 20: 111–118.
- Singh J. 2011. Impact Assessment study of IPM Basmati Project for Boosting Diversification Process in Punjab. Navajbai Rata Tata Trust, Mumbai, India, 43 p.
- USDA-FAS. 2016. World Agricultural Production. Available at: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/worldagproduction/ worldag-production-12-09-2016.pdf
- Natural enemies of whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) on cotton in Punjab, India
Authors
1 Department of Entomology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana - 141004, Punjab, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 32, No 4 (2018), Pagination: 270-274Abstract
The whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) is a polyphagous pest, widely distributed in diverse agroecosystems across the globe. Several bioagents including predators and parasitoids from diverse groups have been recorded against whitefly worldwide. A field survey was conducted during 2016 and 2017 in different cotton growing districts of Punjab to record the natural enemies associated with whitefly. Sixteen species of natural enemies were recorded, including 7 species of insect predators; 2 species of parasitoids and 7 species of spiders. Coccinella septempunctata Linneaus, Cheilomenes sexmaculata (Fabricius) and Brumoides suturalis (Fabricius), Serangium parcesetosum Sicard, Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi (Esben-Peterson), Zanchius breviceps (Wagner), Geocoris sp. and spiders were most commonly recorded predators. Out of these, Chrysoperla was the predominant species. Encarsia lutea (Masi) and Encarsia sophia (Girault & Dodd) were the two parasitoids that emerged from whitefly pupae. The mean parasitization of whitefly by Encarsia spp. in different cotton growing areas of Punjab was 5.20 per cent (range = 1.5 to 9.1 %).Keywords
Cotton, Parasitoid, Predator, Whitefly.References
- Anonymous 2018. Annual Report 2017-18. All India Coordinated Cotton Improvement Project. Central Institute of Cotton Research, Regional Station Coimbatore.
- Boda V, Ilyas M. 2017. Population dynamics of sucking pests of Bt cotton and their correlation with abiotic factors. Bull Env Pharmacol Life Sci. 6: 167-171
- Buxton J. 2005. Control of whiteflies on protected ornamental crops. Factsheet 14/05. Horticultural Development Council in coop. with DEFRA. Bradbourne House,UK
- Gerling D, Alomar O, Arno J 2001. Biological control of Bemisia tabaci using predators and parasitoids. Crop Prot. 20: 779–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/S02612194(01)00111-9
- Hassan F, Qayyum A, M Waqas MA, Hassan M, Rehman MA, Shoaib M, Shehzad M, Ahmad S, Ahmad L, Arshad M. 2016. Cotton leafcurl virus (CLCuV) disease in Pakistan: A critical review. Appl Sci Bus Econ. 3: 8-14.
- Jones DR. 2003. Plant viruses transmitted by whiteflies. Eur J Pl Path. 109: 95-219. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022846630513
- Kedar SC, Saini RK, Kumaranag KM, Sharma SS. 2014. Record of natural enemies of whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in some cultivated crops in Haryana J Biopest 7: 57-59.
- Kutuk H, Yigit A, Alaoglu O. 2008. The effect of season on the levels of predation by the ladybird Serangium parcesetosum Sicard (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on the cotton whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae), a serious pest of eggplants. J Pest Sci. 81: 207-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-008-0207-z
- Kumar V, Dhawan AK and Shera PS. 2015. Transgenic cotton in India: ten years and beyond. pp. 202-227. In: Singh B, Arora R and Gosal S S (Eds.). Biological and Molecular Approaches in Pest management. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur,
- Mann RS, Gill RS, Dhawan AK, Shera PS. 2010. Relative abundance and damage by target and non target insects on Bollgard and Bollgard II cotton cultivars. Crop Prot. 29: 793-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2010.04.006
- Naranjo SE, Ca-as L, Ellsworth PC. 2009. Mortality and population dynamics of Bemisia tabaci within a multi-crop system. pp. 202–207. In: Mason, P.G., Gillespie, D.R., Vincent, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods. Christchurch, New Zealand. USDA Forest Service, FHTET.
- Naranjo SE, Ellsworth PC. 2005. Mortality dynamics and population regulation in Bemisia tabaci. Entomol Exp Appl. 116: 93-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2005.00297.x
- Natarajan K. 1990. Natural enemies of Bemisia tabaci Gennadius and effect of insecticides on their activity. J Biol Control 4: 86-88.
- Oliveira MRV, Amancio E, Laumann RA, Gomes LO. 2003. Natural enemies of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) B biotype and Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Brasilia, DF. Neotrop Entomol. 32: 151-154. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519566X2003000100023
- Perring TM. 2001. The Bemisia tabaci species complex. Crop Prot. 20: 725-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/S02612194(01)00109-0
- Purohit D, Ameta OP, Sarangdevot SS. 2006. Seasonal incidence of major insect pests of cotton and their natural enemies. Pestology 30: 24-29.
- Rao NV, Reddy AS, Rao KT. 1989. Natural enemies of cotton whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Gennadius in relation to host population and weather factors. J Biol Control. 3: 0-12.
- Rawal R, Dahiya KK, Lal R, Kumar A. 2017. Population dynamics of natural enemies on bt / non bt cotton and their correlation with weather parameters. J App Nat Sci. 9: 2360 – 2365.
- Sharma SS, Ram P, Batra GR and Jaglan RS. 2003. Parasitization of whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) by Encarsia lutea (Masi) on different crops. Ann Biol. 19: 103-104.
- Simmons, AM and Abd-Rabou S. 2007. Survey of natural enemies of the sweetpotato whitefly (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in ten vegetable crops in Egypt. J Agric Urban Entomol. 24: 137-145. https://doi.org/10.3954/1523-5475-24.3.137
- Simmons AM, Harrison HF, Ling KS. 2008. Forty-nine new host plant species for Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Entomol Sci. 11: 385–390.
- Torres LC, Lourencao AL, Costa VA, Souza B, Costa, MB and Tanque RL. 2014. Records of natural enemies of Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) Biotype B in Brazil. Neotrop Entomol. 43: 189-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-013-0188-3
- Bioformulations for Management of Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) in Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)
Authors
1 Department of Entomology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004, Punjab, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 33, No 1 (2019), Pagination: 76-79Abstract
Effectiveness of bioformulations was tested against pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) in mungbean during Kharif 2015 and 2016 at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana. Among the bioformulations the per cent pod damage and yield varied from 21.43 to 24.49 per cent and 5.50 to 8.53 q/ha respectively. During Kharif 2016, per cent pod damage and yield varied from 12.00 to 15.69 per cent and 6.30 to 9.33 q/ha respectivley. The chemical treatment Chlorpyrifos 20 EC (3.75 l/ha) was most effective in terms of pod damage reduction and yield of mungbean. The Bt formulations PDBC-BT1 and NBAIR-BTG4 (2%) and both doses of Delfin WG (1 and 2Kg/ha) were equally effective in controlling the H. armigera pod damage when compared to Chlorpyrifos 20EC. Myco Jaal (commercial formulation of Beauveria bassiana) was not effective in controlling the pod borer as compared to B. thuringiensis formulations in mungbean. The B. thuringiensis formulations Delfin (commercial) and PDBC/NBAIR (2%) effectively reduced the pod damage by H. armigera in mungbean and can be integrated in IPM programme for pulse crop protection.Keywords
Bioformulations, Helicoverpa armigera, Mungbean, Pod Damage.References
- Chandrayudu E, Srinivasan S, Venugopal Rao N. 2008. Evaluation of certain newer insecticides against spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Geyer) on cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.). Curr Biotica. 2: 240−243.
- Jagdish J, Agnihotri M, Sharma R. 2014. Evaluation of some bio-pesticides against some important lepidopteron pests of pigeonpea Cajanus cajan L.) at Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India. Greener J Agric Sci. 4: 232−237. https://doi.org/10.15580/GJAS.2014.6.011314034.
- Lal SS. 1985. A review of insect pests of mungbean and their control in India. Tropical Pest Manag. 31: 105−114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670878509370960.
- Lal SS, Ahmad R. 2002. Integrated insect pest management present status and future strategies in pulses. Pp. 101−110. In: Ali M, Chaturvedi SK, Gurha SN (Eds.). Pulses for Sustainable Agriculture and Nutritional Security. Kanpur: IIPR.
- Singh PS, Singh SK. 2015. Comparative evaluation of IPM module and farmer’s practices in Mungbean, Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek against major insect pests. Int J Agric Environ Biotechnol. 8: 215−218. https://doi.org/10.5958/2230-732X.2015.00027.3.
- Sreekanth M, Seshamahalakshmi M. 2012. Studies on relative toxicity of biopesticides to Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) and Maruca vitrata (Geyer) on pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.). J Biopest. 5: 191−195.
- Yadav GS, Dahiya B. 2004. Evaluation of new insecticides/ chemicals against pod borer and pod fly on pigeonpea. Ann Biol. 20: 55−56.
- Yadav NK and Singh PS. 2016. Efficacy of some new insecticides against pod borer in mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). J Food Legumes. 29: 74−75.
- Evaluation of Anthocorid Predator, Blaptostethus pallescens Poppius against Spider Mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch on Okra under Insect Net Cage Condition
Authors
1 Biocontrol Section, Department of Entomology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana – 141004, Punjab, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 33, No 3 (2019), Pagination: 236-241Abstract
The present study deals with the evaluation of anthocorid bug, Blaptostethus pallescens Poppius against Tetranychus urticae Koch on okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.), conducted in Karif season (June-August) during 2013-2015 in the net cage condition at Entomological Research Farm, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana. The 6-7 days old nymphs of B. pallescens @ 10, 20 and 30 nymphs/m2 were released at weekly interval on the mite infested plants and these were compared with chemical control (Omite @ 300ml/acre at 10 days interval) and untreated control. The releases of predators and acaricidal spray on okra were found better than control in suppressing the population of T. urticae. The release of B. pallescens @ 30 nymphs/m2 was found most effective with a 75.86 to 81.20 per cent reduction of mite population over control. It was statistically at par with chemical control, where 84.04 to 91.66 per cent reduction of mite population over control was recorded. There was no significant difference observed in the reduction of mite population of the plots released with 20 and 10 nymphs/m2 of B. pallescens. The yield of okra from the plots of chemical control was recorded highest (52.70 q/acre), followed by 45.05 q/acre from the plots released with a B. pallescens @ 30 nymphs/m2 at seven days interval. The study concluded that, integrating predator, B. pallescens @ 30 nymphs/plant along with acaricide (Omite 300 ml/acre) as a component of IPM for the management of two-spotted spider mite, T. urticae on okra under net house conditions.
Keywords
Anthocorid Bug, Blaptostethus pallescens, Okra, Tetranychus urticae, Two-Spotted Red Spider Mite.References
- Angeli G, Maines R, Sandri O, Trona F, Baldessari M. 2008. Efficacy of the acaricide Omite 57 EW (Propargite) against some strains of spider mite Tetranychus urticae. Giornate Fitopatologiche 1: 289-292.
- Anonymous. 2005.The Hindu Surv. Indian Agric., Chennai, pp. 51-56.
- Anonymous. 2013. Package of Practices for Cultivation of Vegetables. pp 29-35. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
- Ballal CR, Gupta T, Joshi S. 2012. Predatory potential of two indigenous anthocorid predators on Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley and Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink. J Biol Control 26: 18-22.
- Ballal CR, Gupta T, Joshi S, Chandrashekhar K. 2009. Evaluation of an anthocorid predator Blaptostethus pallescens against two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae. IOBC/WPRS Bull. 49: 127-32.
- Ballal CR, Singh SP, Poorani J, Gupta T. 2003. Biology and rearing requirements of an anthocorid predator, Blaptostethus pallescens (Poppius). J Biol Control 17: 29-33.
- Cho JR, Kim YJ, Ahn YJ, Yoo JK, Lee JO. 1995. Monitoring of acaricide resistance in field collected populations of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Korea. Korean J Appl Entomol. 31: 40-45.
- Devine GJ, Barber M, Denholm I. 2001. Incidence and inheritance of resistance to METI-acaricides in European strains of the two spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) (Acari: Tetranychidae). Pest Manag Sci. 57: 443-448. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.307 PMid:11374162
- Dobson H, Copper J, Manyangarirwa W, Karuma J, Chiimba W. 2002. Integrated vegetable pest management: Safe and sustainable protection of small-scale brassicas and tomatoes-A hand book for extension staff and trainers in Zimbabwe. Published by NRI, University of Greenwich, UK,179 pp.
- Efe D, Cakmak I. 2013. Life table parameters and predation of Orius niger (Wolf) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) feeding on two different prey. Turk Entomol Derg. 37: 161-67.
- Ghosh SK. 2013. Sustainable management of red spider mite (Tetranychus sp.) infesting eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) at field level. Uttar Pradesh J Zool. 33: 175-180.
- Gomez KA, Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York, USA, 704 pp.
- Gupta T, Ballal CR, Joshi S. 2011.Preferential feeding of an anthocorid predator, Blaptostethus pallescens Poppius on different stages of cotton mealy bug. J Biol Control 26: 18-22.
- Hayes WJ, Laws ER. 1991. Handbook of pesticide toxicology. Vol1. Academic, San Diego, C A.
- Hernandez LM, Stonedhal GM. 1999. A review of economically important species of genus Orius and Orius sauteri (Hemiptera: Antocoridae) when reared on Ephestia kuehinella eggs. Appl Entomol Zool. 33: 449-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/002229399300245
- Jalali SK, Singh SP. 2002. Seasonal activity of stem borers and their natural enemies on fodder maize. Entomon 27: 137-46.
- Jeppson LR, Keifer HH, Baker EW. 1975. Mite injurious to economic plants. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, 614pp.
- JeyaraniS, Singh RJ, Ramaraju K. 2012. Efficacy of predators against the two spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). J Biol Control 26: 279-282.
- Kaur P, Bhullar MB, Kaur R. 2012. Predatory potential of an anthocorid predator Blaptostethus pallescens (Poppius) against two spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch on brinjal. Proc Agrochem Prot crops, Health Natural Envir 2nd Int conf New Delhi, India.
- Kaur R, Virk JS. 2011. Role of Blaptostethus pallescens (Poppius) and Xylocoris flavipes (Reuter) in the suppression of Corcyra cephalonica Stanton in stored rice grains. J Biol Control 26: 329-332.
- Kumar D, Raghuraman M, Kumar R, Singh D. 2013. Distribution, abundance and bioefficacy of acaricides against red spider mite (Tetranychus urticae Koch) in certain vegetables crops. Prog Res. 8: 309-311.
- Muraleedharan N. 1977. Some genera of Anthocorinae (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) from South India. Entomon 2: 231-35.
- Rahman A, Sarmah, M, Phukan AK, Gurusubramanian G. 2007.Bioactivity of different formulations of propargite 57% EC against red spider mite, Oligonychus coffeae in tea. Res Crops 8: 474-480.
- Rajasekhara K. 1973. A new species of Blaptostethus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) from Mysore, India. Ann Ent Soc Am. 66: 86-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/66.1.86
- Sengonca C, Ahmadi K, Blaeser P. 2008. Biological characteristics of Orius similis Zhang (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) by feeding on different aphid species as prey. J Pl Dis Prot. 115: 32-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03356236
- Srinivasa N, Sugeetha J. 1999. Bioeffectiveness of certain botanicals and synthetic pesticides against okra spider mite Tetranychus macfarlanei. J Acarol. 15: 1-5.
- Wang S, Michand JP, Tan XL, Zhang F. 2014. Comparative suitability of aphids, thrips and mites as prey for the flower bug Orius sauteri (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Eur J Entomol. 111: 221-26. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2014.031
- Zhang SC, Zhu F, Zheng XL, Lei CL, Zhou XM. 2012. Survival and developmental characteristics of predatory bug, Orius similis (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) fed on Teteranychus cinnabarinus (Acari: Tetranychidae) at three constant temperatures. Eur J Entomol. 109: 503-08. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2012.063